Molloy DSG Professional Digest

In any organization or community, the individuals we recognize as leaders hold a significant amount of influence. They set the tone, establish the culture, and often dictate the direction in which the group will move. However, not everyone in a leadership position is inherently worthy of the title "leader." It is crucial to be discerning in whom we acknowledge as a leader, reserving that designation for those who genuinely embody the qualities we admire and respect. For those who do not meet these standards, it is important to use more neutral terms, such as "administrator," to accurately reflect their role without bestowing upon them the reverence associated with true leadership.

Acknowledging someone as a leader implies more than just recognizing their position of authority; it suggests that they are a person worth following, someone whose values, decisions, and behavior are exemplary. When we label someone as a leader who lacks integrity, empathy, or a genuine commitment to the well-being of others, we risk normalizing and even endorsing behaviors that are unworthy of respect. This can lead to a toxic culture where power and influence are valued over character and ethical leadership, ultimately damaging the morale and trust within the group.

Using the term "administrator" or another neutral descriptor for those who hold positions of authority but do not exhibit admirable qualities is a way to differentiate between those who simply occupy a role and those who truly lead. An administrator may manage tasks, enforce policies, and oversee operations, but without the moral compass and people-centered approach that defines a leader, they should not be afforded the same level of respect or influence. This careful distinction helps to set a higher standard for leadership and ensures that only those who genuinely earn the title are recognized as such. Refraining from acknowledging unfit individuals as leaders serves as a powerful message to the community or organization: leadership is not just about holding power, but about earning trust and respect through one's actions and values. It encourages others to aspire to be true leaders, knowing that leadership is more than a title; it is a responsibility to uphold the highest standards of conduct and to act in the best interests of those they serve.

The language we use to describe those in positions of authority matters. By reserving the title of "leader" for those who genuinely deserve it and using more neutral terms like "administrator" for others, we can protect the integrity of leadership and ensure that only those who are truly worthy of admiration and emulation are recognized as leaders. The respect for linguistic discernment of what to call who leads from ahead, and who pushes from behind, helps maintain a healthy and ethical culture; with that clarity individuals can better strive to achieve the qualities that define true leadership.